Short review: I loved it. This is the best fantasy adventure movie I can remember seeing since The Lord of the Rings and the original Star Wars trilogy. The cute sidekick (Woola) was actually cute rather than annoying, and all the characters were well-drawn (though John Carter himself was a bit dour).
The visuals were amazing and the acting was mostly top-notch. There are a few minor cosmetic things I would have changed, but I’m not going to go into those because they were for the most part irrelevant to the spirit of the story. I think it is admirable how close they stayed to the original stories, especially compared to what Hollywood writers usually do with scripts. I’m also impressed by how they did not water down the Confederate soldier aspect of John Carter’s character.
Personally, I think the name of the movie should have been Barsoom. John Carter is just too bland for most movie consumers. Most of the people I talked to had no idea what it was about and were not familiar with the books by Edgar Rice Burroughs. John Carter of Mars would have been better, but still not ideal, as I think it would read as too campy for mainstream audiences. Barsoom sounds mysterious and alien. It would have given the studios a better franchise to work with too. Future titles could have followed the pattern of the book titles (“Warlord of Barsoom,” “Gods of Barsoon,” etc). Unfortunately, due to the studio’s loss on the first installment, we will likely not get a second.
The major criticism I have read by others is regarding the addition of the tragic backstory (see Grognadia and Howling Tower). This actually didn’t bother me that much; being a soldier on the losing side of a war is pretty tragic too, and I don’t think the addition overwhelmed his character. The courtly southern gentleman aspect didn’t really come through at all though, which in my mind is a bigger failing. And where was the southern accent?
I think you’re right that it should’ve been titled “Barsoom”. I hadn’t thought of that. The best idea I’d come up with was titling it Indiana Jones-style: “JOHN CARTER and A Princess of Mars”.
My guess is they wanted to avoid having princess in the title because they didn’t want to scare away the 10 year old boy demographic.
You’re right. The director, Andrew Stanton, has said that the word “princess” was removed from the title because ‘no boys would want to see a movie about a princess’ and the word “Mars” was removed from the title because ‘no girls would want to see a movie about Mars’. The problem is, of course, that neither boys nor girls wanted to see a movie about John Carter. And I think he was wrong about how boys & girls would react to the words “princess” & “Mars” anyway.
Glad you liked it. I thought it was aiming for something much greater than much of what comes out of ‘movie sci-fi/fantasy’ these days–that sense of wonder and adventure that not even Avatar seemed to quite understand. As a Southerner, I’m also quite happy that they didn’t try to white-wash Carter’s Confederate background, although I wish they had let him have a stronger accent. We don’t have many great Southern fantasy heroes. Perhaps I’ll post a review of my own soon.